The Big Lie: Promises of Freedom in Afghan History

The Big Lie: Promises of Freedom in Afghan History

Hasht-e Subh|

An article published by Hasht-e Subh titled "The Big Lie" argues that promises of freedom and popular sovereignty in modern Afghan history have masked a deeper logic of external control and societal containment.

The piece traces this pattern from the era of Abdul Rahman Khan, whose centralized government emerged from colonial balances rather than collective will, involving suppression of local structures and social cohesion. It cites the Battle of Maiwand in 1880 during the Second Anglo-Afghan War, where Afghan forces under Ayub Khan defeated British troops, demonstrating popular will's potential. However, the article contends this military victory did not yield lasting political freedom, as it was channeled into structures reinforcing control, with Abdul Rahman Khan stabilized as a controllable figure.

The analysis extends to the 1990s Taliban takeover and the post-2001 period following their initial fall. It describes the Bonn Conference designating Hamid Karzai as leader through externally supported political agreements, leading to a republic marred by corruption, eroded legitimacy, and flawed elections in 2009, 2014, and 2019. The Doha Agreement, signed without effective public or prior government involvement, facilitated the Taliban's return and Kabul's fall in August 2021, perpetuating dependency.

The article asserts that external powers continue indirect engagement with the Taliban without full recognition or isolation, maintaining a dual status. It concludes that true legitimacy and freedom require internal awakening, organization, and responsibility by Afghans themselves, rather than reliance on foreign powers or regime changes.

Know more about this story?

If you have additional information or believe something is inaccurate, let us know. Your tips help us stay accurate.

More in Politics